Thorsten's initial suggestion is the agreed-upon method, not PJ's. https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2018-May/036178.html
Instead of oneway=yes and oneway=-1, use :lanes:forward or :lanes:backward in the key. And as many have pointed out, don't touch the main "lanes" tag, which excludes bike lanes. So your (basic) tagging would be (for a right-hand driving country): highway=unclassified (or whatever) vehicles:lanes:forward=yes|no vehicles:lanes:backward=yes|no bicycle:lanes:forward=no|designated bicycle:lanes:backward=no|designated This assumes that bikes aren't legally permitted to use the main carriageway; otherwise use yes|designated for the bike lanes. On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 7:04 PM, Volker Schmidt <vosc...@gmail.com> wrote: > May I kindly ask my fellow mappers to come back to my initial question > about tagging of oneway cycle lanes? I would like to get an amswer without > changing the existing tagging schemes for lanes. > > Thanks in advance > > > On 13 May 2018 at 16:30, Paul Johnson <ba...@ursamundi.org> wrote: > >> >> >> On Sun, May 13, 2018, 00:37 Marc Gemis <marc.ge...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> For your first image lanes=0, lanes:forward=2, lanes:backward=1. >>> >> >> This literally doesn't add up. Also, that's a shoulder on the right, >> Tulsa screwed up and used white paint for the centerline. >> >> Awkward but correct. But as said before, the lanes tag is pretty >>> useless beside some simple, straightforward street layouts, for even >>> number of total lanes evenly divided in both directions. Lanes=3 is >>> useless, not? >>> >> >> No! That tag makes it easy to find a tagging error further down. >> There's a good reason validators choke when the forward, backward and >> both_ways lanes don't total the lane count. Editors set this >> automatically, validators throw errors for on this because that idea is >> brick to the head, physically induced brain trauma, short-bus riding >> special. >> >> So once again, define a new tag or do not use the lanes tag, or use it >>> as it is defined now. Do not change its meaning. >>> >> >> I'm not, the wiki is. >> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
