Not really transient and some routes can be over 500m in length. For example, in Karşıyaka, more than 100 people/min/sq-m walks following Bahriye Üçok Boulevard (western sidewalk only) and Kemalpaşa Avenue (pedestrianised during the day and evening, pedestrian priority otherwise, marked by a pedestrian zone sign) between Karşıyaka Underground Car Parking and "Hergele Meydanı" (all comers' square).
05-05-2018 17:51 tarihinde osm.tagg...@thorsten.engler.id.au yazdı: > If they are unmarked on the ground, are they documented somewhere? > > Or is it simply a case of "this is a common route a lot of people walk during > certain times as there is a strong flow of people from A to B and this is the > most commonly used route"? (In which case they aren't really something that > exists as an entity of it's own and are only a transient event, though maybe > a commonly reoccurring one.) > > In either case, it doesn't sound like a "walking bus" at all. > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Erkin Alp Güney <erkinalp9...@gmail.com> >> Sent: Sunday, 6 May 2018 00:09 >> To: tagging@openstreetmap.org >> Subject: Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Walkingbus_stop >> >> No, foot tram routes are unmarked but you can easily join one by >> following the crowd. Normal foot routes have guiding signs. >> >> >> 05-05-2018 17:05 tarihinde osm.tagg...@thorsten.engler.id.au yazdı: >>> Without a "driver", fixed "stops" and a defined schedule, that >> sounds more like what's currently already mapped using route=foot >> relations? >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Erkin Alp Güney <erkinalp9...@gmail.com> >>>> Sent: Saturday, 5 May 2018 23:28 >>>> To: tagging@openstreetmap.org >>>> Subject: Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Walkingbus_stop >>>> >>>> We also have walking bus routes in Turkey but without drivers. We >>>> call them "tabanvay", foot tram. You can have very crowded >> walking >>>> bus routes in peak times, especially in pedestrian road networks. >>>> >>>> >>>> 05-05-2018 15:59 tarihinde osm.tagg...@thorsten.engler.id.au >> yazdı: >>>>> If there are actual poles and stop signs, you can only “board” >> at >>>>> these places and at specific times, and the “driver” stays with >>>> the >>>>> group from the first to the last stop, then yeah, I can see this >>>> as >>>>> being very different from a “school crossing guard” which >>>> generally >>>>> stays at one specific crossing and controls the traffic there. >> And >>>>> under these conditions, I think the term “platform” as it is >> used >>>> in >>>>> PTv2 does apply to the position of the poles. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *From:*Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> >>>>> *Sent:* Saturday, 5 May 2018 22:42 >>>>> *To:* Tag discussion, strategy and related tools >>>>> <tagging@openstreetmap.org> >>>>> *Subject:* Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - >> Walkingbus_stop >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> sent from a phone >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 4. May 2018, at 22:34, Johnparis <ok...@johnfreed.com >>>>> <mailto:ok...@johnfreed.com>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Please DO follow Thorsten's suggestion and follow PTv2, >>>> mapping >>>>> the stops as nodes alongside the street/way (not on it) in >> the >>>>> proper direction. Tag each one: >>>>> >>>>> walking_bus=yes >>>>> >>>>> public_transport=platform >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> is walking really a kind of “public transport”? Are we going to >>>> tag >>>>> places as public transport platforms where people are waiting >> for >>>>> someone else to accompany them for walking somewhere? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> To me “walking bus” seems just a new buzzword for a service that >>>> has >>>>> been in existence for a long time (school crossing guards) and >>>> that >>>>> was never considered public transport until someone proclaimed >> it >>>>> could be seen as kind of “bus” but without a vehicle ;-) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I don’t think it shouldn’t be tagged, but I don’t see it as >> public >>>>> transport either, particularly I don’t believe we should use the >>>> term >>>>> platform in context of this kind of service >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> cheers, >>>>> >>>>> Martin >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Tagging mailing list >>>>> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >>>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Tagging mailing list >>>> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Tagging mailing list >>> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
