One should keep in mind some mappers don't care mapping public_transport in all
its subtleties, however they can simply want to map a
__
| |
platform by the side of a road when they spot one, and
|
|
bus_stop also.
Yves
Le 9 avril 2018 23:59:21 GMT+02:00, Michael Reichert <osm...@michreichert.de> a
écrit :
>Hi,
>
>Am 31.03.2018 um 17:00 schrieb Johnparis:
>> This implies the following changes to v2:
>>
>> 1) every platform node should have mandatory {mode}=yes tag(s)
>
>I also think that public_transport=platform without *=yes tags is some
>kind of incomplete.
>
>> 2) stop_positions should be optional on the map and should not be
>included
>> in the route relations
>
>Stop positions should be optional but there are some cases where they
>are useful. If they are mapped, they should be added to the route
>relation. If we don't add them to the route relations, we can skip them
>at all.
>
>> I'm inclined to agree with the wiki that the v1 tags on nodes should
>remain
>> (including the two million highway=bus_stop tags).
>>
>> I don't really see a big advantage in changing the value of the v2
>tag from
>> public_transport=platform to something like
>public_transport=wait_area (and
>> there are about one million public_transport=platform tags at the
>moment).
>
>+1
>
>If you try to invent new tags just to replace old tags and the old tags
>are used very often, a proposal is doomed to fail.
>
>Best regards
>
>Michael
>
>--
>Per E-Mail kommuniziere ich bevorzugt GPG-verschlüsselt. (Mailinglisten
>ausgenommen)
>I prefer GPG encryption of emails. (does not apply on mailing lists)
Yves_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
