One point that hasn't been discussed (and isn't in the subject line) is
that part of Ilya's proposal is to also drop stations.

I would move in the opposite direction and expand the role of stations.
Here's why.

In many (many) cases, GTFS data from bus operators includes a single
StopPoint value for what are in fact multiple stopping points (platforms)
within a station. It would greatly simplify matters if the *station* itself
could be considered the platform. I would suggest this could be
accomplished by including the station (node/way/area) in the route relation
with the role "station" (or, as appropriate, station_entry_only or
station_exit_only).

Not sure what usefulness, if any, this would have for rail routes.



On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 9:46 AM, Jo <winfi...@gmail.com> wrote:

> highway=platform and railway=platform on a WAY or an AREA are perfectly
> fine tags for such platforms, where they exist. Until about a year ago I
> was also adding public_transport=platform to these ways, but as it creates
> confusion with the platform NODES, which as far as I am concerned represent
> the bus and tram stops, I stopped doing that.
>
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/PT_
> Assistant/Mapping_Public_Transport_with_JOSM
>
> Jo
>
> 2018-03-31 9:23 GMT+02:00 Selfish Seahorse <selfishseaho...@gmail.com>:
>
>> Is public_transport=platform now about the structure or the function?
>>
>> If it is about the function, then we need a separate tag for the
>> platform structure.
>>
>> If it is about the structure, then we should decide to either map the
>> sidewalk or public_transport=platform (depending on how we define a
>> platform). Otherwise, we say that there are two physical structures,
>> which is wrong.
>>
>> On 30 March 2018 at 19:41, "Christian Müller" <cmu...@gmx.de> wrote:
>> >> Gesendet: Freitag, 30. März 2018 um 11:06 Uhr
>> >> Von: "Selfish Seahorse" <selfishseaho...@gmail.com>
>> >> An: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" <
>> tagging@openstreetmap.org>
>> >> Betreff: Re: [Tagging] Still RFC — Drop stop positions and platforms
>> >>
>> >> I wouldn't call a sidewalk a platform, especially because the waiting
>> >> area on the sidewalk often isn't clearly delimited. Furthermore,
>> >> double tagging doesn't work if the sidewalk is called 'X Road' and the
>> >> bus stop 'Y Square'.
>> >>
>> >
>> > If a sidewalk _functions_ as a platform, than you can indeed call that
>> > part of the sidewalk a platform, depending on which role of the area
>> > you are currently talking about.  This is time-dependent:
>> >
>> > If lots of people are standing and waiting on that sidewalk for a
>> > vehicle to arrive, it will be easier for you to see why this is (also)
>> > a platform, than e.g. at night time without a PT service serving the
>> > halt.
>> >
>> > A thing as simple as a box may be used as a table or chair.  This is
>> > the same thing here.  You have a physical structure that is so simple
>> > that it may function as a platform or a sidewalk, depending on current
>> > use.
>> >
>> >
>> > Greetings
>> > cmuelle8
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Tagging mailing list
>> > Tagging@openstreetmap.org
>> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to