sent from a phone
> On 10. Apr 2017, at 07:17, Clifford Snow <cliff...@snowandsnow.us> wrote: > > Any suggestions on how we should be mapping forested areas would be > appreciated. my suggestion is to map the following 3 aspects (not necessarily in the same osm feature, but orthogonally, also overlapping if required): natural=*. the named feature/forest, also nested smaller ones inside bigger ones. This is for toponyms and geographic features, e.g. a pond in the forest would be included landuse =forest. areas used to grow and log trees (actual current human use of land), a pond would not be included but a clearcut area still dedicated to growing trees would. landcover=trees all kind of areas where trees grow (physical aspect) cheers, Martin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
