On 09-Apr-17 08:13 PM, Mattias Dalkvist wrote:
I should describe my use case a bit more: When hiking and planing a hike (in Scandinavian forests) it is very useful to know/see where the clearing (from clearcutting) are. Resent ones have lost of wet tracks from the harvesters but also areas that was cleared 5-10 years ago as they are often thick with young birch trees.

Basically these areas are part of a larger forest just in the beginning of the ~100 year growth cycle and having a way to represent at an intermediate detail level is what I'm after. IE more into then just forest without having to differentiate the stages, ground/scrub/young mixed forest etc. As seeing the differences from satellite imaginary can be hard specially when it is not that easy to find the date of the imaginary.

--
Dalkvist


That is fine.

I would also like to know when a harvest is planed, so I can avoid the area when that is taking place (traffic, noise and dust).

Where an area has been clear felled, replanted and is now thick.. they usually do a selective harvest to thin it out and leave the best trees for future harvest. So there may be a need to tag that too?

Other crops of a long term nature? The ones I can think of are all tree related e.g. sandalwood.

Satellite imagery is not much use for this.
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to