2016-10-24 23:48 GMT+02:00 Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>:
>
> Use the same method as for bridges ..
>
> the 'primary' feature name
>
> name=*
>
> the 'other' feature
>
> hunting:name=*
>
> forest:name=*
>
> These details are trivial.
I do indeed propose the same method as for bridges, where I had pushed for
the introduction of man_made=bridge as a proper object that represents the
bridge and that can get properties like "name", "ref" etc. rather than
adding indirect tags like "bridge_name" on a road for the bridge over which
the road goes.
Yes, you can do all kind of indirect mapping ("on the left sidewalk of this
road, 20 m after this point, there is a bollard with a width of 40 cm,
leaving 1,20 m free space left and 0,80 m right of the bollard in the
direction of the highway way" can all be tagged indirectly on a highway way
for a road, but it doesn't make a lot of sense IMHO, it only would lead to
data consumers very likely dropping the information, it would lead to
mappers having difficulties understanding complex situations, it would lead
to the highway way being split into many pieces because of properties of
its sidewalk, etc.).
Cheers,
Martin
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
