On 25-Oct-16 03:57 AM, Yves wrote:
Puting aside the pleasure to debate over landuse and landcover, what about defining hunting = as a permission tag, and invent a new polygon type dedicated to define a hunting area boundary where no other polygon is suitable to add this tag to?
Yves

Nice idea. Thank you Yves for thinking of the basics.


Le 24 octobre 2016 13:29:21 GMT+02:00, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> a écrit :

    On 24-Oct-16 07:54 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:

    2016-10-23 11:48 GMT+02:00 Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com
    <mailto:61sundow...@gmail.com>>:

        And reiterate your words " in case of a dedicated area" and
        mine "For an area dedicated to the hunting of game then 
landuse=hunting" ..
        I think that is fairly clear ... dedicated, primary use is hunting.

        Most 'landuse' have more than one function, but the primary use is 
tagged.

        If the primary use is forest then it could be tagged landuse=forest 
with a secondary tag of hunting=* as you have put forward.
        If the primary use is hunting then landuse=hunting should be used.



    who is declaring the "primary use"?
    The mapper - as usual.
    How would you judge this?
    Same as I would judge anything else - from the available evidence.
    landuse=forest is the only widely accepted way to tag an area
    where trees grow (besides mapping single trees, and besides the
    landcover=trees property which I myself try to push and besides
    the natural=wood tag which is disputed in meaning because of the
    unclear term "natural"), i.e. if you decided that a forest was
    meant "primarily for hunting", you couldn't map it as a forest...

    I would use the following combination;

    landuse=hunting
    landcover=trees
    natural=wood (I too don't 'like' this and for that reason I tend
    to dual tag with the landcover=trees tag. However natural=wood is
    'widely accepted', just not by some)

    If the area were primarily used for the production of tees and/or
    their products with hunting as another use I would use the
    following combination;

    landuse=forest
    hunting=yes (or permissive etc)

    -------------------
    To me landuse=forest is only for areas where trees are grown for
    the production of products from those trees e.g. lumber, wood
    pulp, oils, rubber, maple syrup


    ------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Tagging mailing list
    Tagging@openstreetmap.org
    https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

-- Envoyé de mon appareil Android avec K-9 Mail. Veuillez excuser ma brièveté.

_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to