Puting aside the pleasure to debate over landuse and landcover, what about
defining hunting = as a permission tag, and invent a new polygon type
dedicated to define a hunting area boundary where no other polygon is suitable
to add this tag to?
Yves
Le 24 octobre 2016 13:29:21 GMT+02:00, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>On 24-Oct-16 07:54 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>>
>> 2016-10-23 11:48 GMT+02:00 Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com
>> <mailto:61sundow...@gmail.com>>:
>>
>> And reiterate your words " in case of a dedicated area" and
>> mine "For an area dedicated to the hunting of game then
>landuse=hunting" ..
>> I think that is fairly clear ... dedicated, primary use is
>hunting.
>>
>> Most 'landuse' have more than one function, but the primary use
>is tagged.
>>
>> If the primary use is forest then it could be tagged
>landuse=forest with a secondary tag of hunting=* as you have put
>forward.
>> If the primary use is hunting then landuse=hunting should be
>used.
>>
>>
>>
>> who is declaring the "primary use"?
>The mapper - as usual.
>> How would you judge this?
>Same as I would judge anything else - from the available evidence.
>> landuse=forest is the only widely accepted way to tag an area where
>> trees grow (besides mapping single trees, and besides the
>> landcover=trees property which I myself try to push and besides the
>> natural=wood tag which is disputed in meaning because of the unclear
>> term "natural"), i.e. if you decided that a forest was meant
>> "primarily for hunting", you couldn't map it as a forest...
>
>I would use the following combination;
>
>landuse=hunting
>landcover=trees
>natural=wood (I too don't 'like' this and for that reason I tend to
>dual
>tag with the landcover=trees tag. However natural=wood is 'widely
>accepted', just not by some)
>
>If the area were primarily used for the production of tees and/or their
>
>products with hunting as another use I would use the following
>combination;
>
>landuse=forest
>hunting=yes (or permissive etc)
>
>-------------------
>To me landuse=forest is only for areas where trees are grown for the
>production of products from those trees e.g. lumber, wood pulp, oils,
>rubber, maple syrup
>
>
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>Tagging mailing list
>Tagging@openstreetmap.org
>https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
--
Envoyé de mon appareil Android avec K-9 Mail. Veuillez excuser ma brièveté.
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
