OK, that sounds good as well. Maybe still have some sort of tagging for the type so that we can show a letterbox as Mr Díaz de Argandoña requests?
(As I said earlier, I'm unlikely to tag such a beast, because the clubs where I climb request that climbers not share coordinates of the registers or GPS tracks of the routes on the peaks without established trails.) -- 73 de ke9tv/2, Kevin On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 2:20 PM, ksg <ks...@web.de> wrote: > > > Am 06.09.2016 um 19:55 schrieb Kevin Kenny <kevin.b.kenny+...@gmail.com > >: > > > > I would think that the proposal could be adapted to the thing that you > describe: 'tourism=register register:type=letterbox' or some such tagging. > What do you think? > > > > > The tag summit:register=* is not yet defined in the wiki, but is > widespread used in the Alps of Europe with > 600 instances. > > https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/summit%3Aregister#values > > geow > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
