In think the word you may be looking for is "ornamental". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ornamental_plant
Could you use landuse=field? The wiki suggests it has been abandoned but perhaps it should be used in the context. Presumably you could then add, field=ornamental_flowers. Regards Dudley > From: dieterdre...@gmail.com > Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2015 14:53:45 +0100 > To: tagging@openstreetmap.org > Subject: Re: [Tagging] Decorative flower fields? (not as a crop?) > > > > sent from a phone > > > Am 29.11.2015 um 14:02 schrieb John Willis <jo...@mac.com>: > > > > Thinking of creating landuse=flower_display For sections of land that a > > cultivated with flowers for decorative/attraction purposes - > > > I think that's too specific for landuse. "exhibitional" isn't a proper word I > guess, but something like it might be a more generic approach. Still, if > there are just some foreign flowers brought into a natural setting, and > without maintenance, I would prefer an attribute approach which doesn't > "occupy" the landuse object but can be associated to other features like > forests, meadows etc. (this for cases where you are not tagging the > individual plant) > > cheers > Martin > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
