> On Jul 12, 2015, at 10:34 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > sent from a phone > >> Am 11.07.2015 um 14:43 schrieb John Willis <jo...@mac.com>: >> >> I look forward to more feedback before drawing up a wiki page, but you can >> see my reasoning and 2 good examples below. This is something not covered >> well by track+grade1 IMO and below unclassified IMO. > > > if they've connectivity functions they are unclassified (general access > presumed) or grade1 tracks (agricultural traffic). "Below unclassified" there > is nothing when it comes to connectivity, we already have 5 levels of > hierarchy for "normal roads" in osm (trunk, prim to tert and unclassified) > which I believe should be enough. Maybe you have to raise your current > unclassified roads to tertiary to make room for these roads in question? > > > Cheers > Martin > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
