> On Jul 12, 2015, at 10:34 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> agricultural traffic


The farmers access their fields using small, yet common kei trucks 
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kei_truck 
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kei_truck>) that are used all over Japan in 
urban and rural environs. There are very few slow moving tractors, as they come 
out only during field prep and harvest time for the rice. (twice a year?)

These roads are not just for agricultural vehicle traffic - but they are not 
important through ways except for very local access or for maintenance access 
for an aqueduct, train viaduct, or other public works that needs access for 
maintenance (again they’re public accessible and public routable, but not 
useful). 

If we know that this occurs in rich countries ( well maintained yet unimportant 
side roads) why is adding a value to service=* a problem? we use service= for 
so many other things, and it seems the most appropriate here. 

if a country has this separation (IMO) between unclassified/residential,  
service, and track - why would we map it in the city but not in the 
countryside? Why does it matter if it’s Ag traffic?  These aren’t tractor 
roads. Those branch off these roads. most of the time it’s road-only cars. Does 
the fact that granny farms tomatoes on that road and granny cuts hair on the 
other road really the difference between track and alley? neither road fits the 
"purpose" of track, yet one is deemed to be tagged with it. 

I know the reply is “then move it to unclassified” - but that muddies the 
meaning of unclassified. Can’t we use the same “city" scheme in the countryside 
when it also applies?

IMO, it applies here. The Japanese road network is as complex as a city network 
even in rural areas.  

service=[rural or similar] seems to be the best way to *further define and 
document* the existing usage usage of highway=service on these roads by some 
mappers.

Thanks for your comments, I hope I have clarified my position further.

Javbw

_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to