+1 to Martin Really super large fountains (like the one in front of the Bellagiao(?) in LasVegas is giant, and mapping the nozzles is possible - but a nozzle is not an amenity. But the fountain itself is a fountain (and landmark), which places it in amenity.
Perhaps a fountain sub-key Fountain=* For the nozzles, lights, water fill, water return, shut-off/control box, and filter set is a good idea (even if most of those are unrendered), for fountain people to map the entire system. Javbw > On May 31, 2015, at 7:31 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > >> Am 31.05.2015 um 11:44 schrieb AYTOUN RALPH <ralph.ayt...@ntlworld.com>: >> >> I am a bit puzzled by the use of amenity here. >> >> According to wiki it is "Covering an assortment of community facilities..." >> that are of obvious use to locals and/or tourists such as toilets, banks, >> schools. > > > I agree with regard to "nozzle" while for fountains amenity is OK and is very > established > > > >> I find the use of amenity for things like a bar or biergarten or sauna to be >> outside this description. > > > but they are how the current scheme defines it, restaurants etc all are in > amenity > > > >> >> I also do not understand the use of amenity for a tourist or ornamental >> feature such as a fountain? > > > a fountain is not a "tourist" feature in my eyes, they are much older than > tourism in general. they are part of the urban furniture and serve for > decoration, accentuation but sometimes also practical purposes like providing > drinking water, cooling, etc > > >> >> Surely it is just a "place-of-interest" and would be under tourism=fountain >> for those fountains that are of interest to the visitor (and would therefore >> not be confused with a drinking fountain which would be an >> amenity=drinking_water) and man_made=fountain for others of less note (as I >> am unaware of a general place_of_interest tag). > > > -1, I would not suggest to use different tags based on such a weak criterion > like "interest to the visitor" > I also hardly can find any particular relation of visitors and fountains, > besides that they look at them (just as they visit churches, but we are not > tagging tourism=church). > > I'd keep amenity=fountain and render just a name (zoomlevel area size > dependent ) with no icon, and would use > man_made=nozzle or maybe > waterway=nozzle > for the single nozzle (not rendered in default style or rendered just with a > small dot) > > cheers > Martin > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging