+1 to Martin

Really super large fountains (like the one in front of the Bellagiao(?) in 
LasVegas is giant, and mapping the nozzles is possible - but a nozzle is not an 
amenity. But the fountain itself is a fountain (and landmark), which places it 
in amenity. 

Perhaps a fountain sub-key 

Fountain=*

For the nozzles, lights, water fill, water return, shut-off/control box, and 
filter set is a good idea (even if most of those are unrendered), for fountain 
people to map the entire system. 

Javbw 


> On May 31, 2015, at 7:31 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> Am 31.05.2015 um 11:44 schrieb AYTOUN RALPH <ralph.ayt...@ntlworld.com>:
>> 
>> I am a bit puzzled by the use of amenity here.
>> 
>> According to wiki it is "Covering an assortment of community facilities..." 
>> that are of obvious use to locals and/or tourists such as toilets, banks, 
>> schools.
> 
> 
> I agree with regard to "nozzle" while for fountains amenity is OK and is very 
> established 
> 
> 
> 
>> I find the use of amenity for things like a bar or biergarten or sauna to be 
>> outside this description.
> 
> 
> but they are how the current scheme defines it, restaurants etc all are in 
> amenity
> 
> 
> 
>> 
>> I also do not understand the use of amenity for a tourist or ornamental 
>> feature such as a fountain?
> 
> 
> a fountain is not a "tourist" feature in my eyes, they are much older than 
> tourism in general. they are part of the urban furniture and serve for 
> decoration, accentuation but sometimes also practical purposes like providing 
> drinking water, cooling, etc
> 
> 
>> 
>> Surely it is just a "place-of-interest" and would be under tourism=fountain 
>> for those fountains that are of interest to the visitor (and would therefore 
>> not be confused with a drinking fountain which would be an 
>> amenity=drinking_water) and man_made=fountain for others of less note (as I 
>> am unaware of a general place_of_interest tag).
> 
> 
> -1, I would not suggest to use different tags based on such a weak criterion 
> like "interest to the visitor"
> I also hardly can find any particular relation of visitors and fountains, 
> besides that they look at them (just as they visit churches, but we are not 
> tagging tourism=church).
> 
> I'd keep amenity=fountain and render just a name (zoomlevel area size 
> dependent ) with no icon, and would use
> man_made=nozzle or maybe 
> waterway=nozzle
> for the single nozzle (not rendered in default style or rendered just with a 
> small dot)
> 
> cheers 
> Martin 
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to