I am a bit puzzled by the use of amenity here.
According to wiki it is "Covering an assortment of community
facilities..." that
are of obvious use to locals and/or tourists such as toilets, banks,
schools.
I find the use of amenity for things like a bar or biergarten or sauna to
be outside this description.
I also do not understand the use of amenity for a tourist or ornamental
feature such as a fountain?
Please, if we are going to discuss how to tag a feature then let us first
put it in it's correct category.
Surely it is just a "place-of-interest" and would be under tourism=fountain
for those fountains that are of interest to the visitor (and would
therefore not be confused with a drinking fountain which would be an
amenity=drinking_water) and man_made=fountain for others of less note (as I
am unaware of a general place_of_interest tag).
On 31 May 2015 at 00:50, Daniel Koć <daniel@koć.pl> wrote:
> W dniu 31.05.2015 1:33, Warin napisał(a):
>
> Big?
>>
>> Height over, say, 5 metres? Use the height= tag.
>> Width/length over, say, 10 metres? Use the appropriate tag.
>> {There is no diameter tag? Could be usefull for pipelines and
>> fountains and silos and etc..}
>>
>
> I mean big like the whole area:
>
>
> https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/705#issuecomment-80713898
>
> Is tagging each nozzle here as amenity=fountain proper? I guess not,
> because the name belongs to the whole area (fountain object), not to
> individual nozzles.
>
> --
> "The train is always on time / The trick is to be ready to put your bags
> down" [A. Cohen]
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
