Mike, you are missing the point... A building and an address are two different things. A building may have 0 to N addresses. An address may or may not refer to a building. The "business rules" to link the two concepts vary by country. An address is not usually a unique identifier of a building - it's for getting the post delivered to the right letter box.
On 2015-05-27 00:56, pmailkeey . wrote: > On 26 May 2015 at 09:11, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> Am 25.05.2015 um 17:53 schrieb pmailkeey . <pmailk...@googlemail.com>: >>> >>> CONGRATULATIONS ! You win the award for the best puzzle of the year! It >>> appears to be a loose numbering system for identifying entrances rather >>> than properties. >> >> that's what I told you initially, you said tagging a node would be "wrong" >> and I replied it depends on the region. In Italy it seems they really >> associate a number to (most) entrances. Even more crazy, I have seen a >> number of places (different towns/villages) where the existing, old >> numbering was changed (strike through of old, often stone engraved number >> and new number with paint or adhesive sticker). I cannot imagine any reason >> if not to deliberately create confusion ;-) > > Building addresses shouldn't be on nodes. Named entrances can be - on > ent/exit nodes. > -- > > Mike. > > @millomweb [2] - For all your info on Millom and South Copeland > via THE AREA'S PREMIER WEBSITE - > > CURRENTLY UNAVAILABLE DUE TO ONGOING HARASSMENT OF ME, MY FAMILY, PROPERTY & > PETS > > T&Cs [3] > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging [1] Links: ------ [1] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging [2] https://sites.google.com/site/millomweb/index/introduction [3] https://sites.google.com/site/pmailkeey/e-mail
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
