On 26 May 2015 at 09:11, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > Am 25.05.2015 um 17:53 schrieb pmailkeey . <pmailk...@googlemail.com>: > > > > CONGRATULATIONS ! You win the award for the best puzzle of the year! It > appears to be a loose numbering system for identifying entrances rather > than properties. > > > that's what I told you initially, you said tagging a node would be "wrong" > and I replied it depends on the region. In Italy it seems they really > associate a number to (most) entrances. Even more crazy, I have seen a > number of places (different towns/villages) where the existing, old > numbering was changed (strike through of old, often stone engraved number > and new number with paint or adhesive sticker). I cannot imagine any reason > if not to deliberately create confusion ;-) > > Building addresses shouldn't be on nodes. Named entrances can be - on ent/exit nodes. -- Mike. @millomweb <https://sites.google.com/site/millomweb/index/introduction> - For all your info on Millom and South Copeland via *the area's premier website - * *currently unavailable due to ongoing harassment of me, my family, property & pets* T&Cs <https://sites.google.com/site/pmailkeey/e-mail>
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
