On 21 May 2015 at 02:08, Ross <i...@4x4falcon.com> wrote: > > > On 21/05/15 09:51, pmailkeey . wrote: > > > > On 20 May 2015 at 14:10, André Pirard <a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> We know that addr:housenumber >> <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr>=* can be tagged on nodes >> <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses#How_to_map_addresses> and >> that it's very convenient. >> > > But wrong. > > > Why? It's all very well that this may be you opinion but the wiki and > accepted practice says otherwise. > >
Address = building = area, not node. It's 'accepted' as a second best option for where a building hasn't been drawn. I find quite a lot of them and remove them by transferring the data to the buildings - sometimes there's a building and a loose node containing the same data! In those cases, a simple node deletion is required. -- Mike. @millomweb <https://sites.google.com/site/millomweb/index/introduction> - For all your info on Millom and South Copeland via *the area's premier website - * *currently unavailable due to ongoing harassment of me, my family, property & pets* T&Cs <https://sites.google.com/site/pmailkeey/e-mail>
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
