Some places have individual tent locations but no street address:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/34.80931/-119.17480&layers=D
On April 22, 2015 7:51:26 AM PDT, Clifford Snow <cliff...@snowandsnow.us> wrote:
>On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 1:51 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
><dieterdre...@gmail.com
>> wrote:
>
>> I agree with Bryce that addr:unit could be an interesting candidate
>for
>> all these similar situations. Wonder if we would repeat the complete
>> address information on every single object then. Another issue with
>> campsites could be that they will more likely have several addresses
>> (several entrances), and while this also happens for buildings, the
>units
>> in buildings typically have one street address associated with them,
>while
>> on a camp site it might be less clear, so a simple addr:unit would
>probably
>> be best
>
>
>When adding unit numbers in buildings I always include the whole
>address.
>Why not do the same for camp grounds? Having the street name could
>avoid a
>routing issue if there where more than one campground in the area. Just
>addr:unit may work, but why not suggest in the wiki to add all elements
>of
>addr?
>
>
>--
>@osm_seattle
>osm_seattle.snowandsnow.us
>OpenStreetMap: Maps with a human touch
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>Tagging mailing list
>Tagging@openstreetmap.org
>https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
