On Mon, 2015-04-20 at 11:13 +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > I think the number should go into ref, e.g. > ref=42 > camping:pitch=yes or camp_site:pitch=yes (etc., e.g. permanent, > tent, ...) not actually proposed or detailed yet >
Martin, think that makes sense, there are a whole range of things people might want to identify as belonging to a particular pitch. Power, tap, fireplace, shade, suitably to [caravan; tent] etc... I rather not add this to the existing proposal for camp_site= as I believe it needs a fair bit more "socalisation" (to us an IBM term). What say we get camp_site= through the process than start a new one looking at individual pitches ? David _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
