Is "supported" reasonable? On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 4:41 PM Tobias Knerr <o...@tobias-knerr.de> wrote:
> On 03.04.2015 11:22, Bryce Nesbitt wrote: > > The proposal on the table is to change the wiki status of "Approved" to > > read "Published" > > I would prefer to stay with "approved". Using "published" would not > actually make things clearer, quite the opposite: Using the normal > meaning of "published", a proposal is published as soon as someone hits > the save button. > > > The feeling is the term "published" is less > > likely to cause new mappers to incorrectly weight the tagging > > conventions described on the wiki. > > Placing more weight on tags that are the result of public discussion and > represent a consensus among interested mappers is actually a good thing. > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
