Will it be clear for new mappers what the difference is between published and documented (i.e. someone created a wiki page that describes a tag without voting or one that didn't collect enough votes)? Wouldn't endorsed be better?
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 11:30 AM Dan S <danstowell+...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2015-04-03 10:22 GMT+01:00 Bryce Nesbitt <bry...@obviously.com>: > > On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 11:21 PM, François Lacombe > > <fl.infosrese...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> Hi all, > >> > >> +1 with Bryce and "published" instead of "approved" > >> +1 with Ole regarding power features > >> > >> Cheers > >> François > > > > > > So let's see if we can make it happen. The question of what wiki > approval > > means has been a thorn for a long time. > > > > The proposal on the table is to change the wiki status of "Approved" to > read > > "Published", > > with no other changes. The feeling is the term "published" is less > likely > > to cause new mappers to incorrectly weight the tagging conventions > described > > on the wiki. > > > > This change requires Wiki administrator cooperation and buy in, to > > implement. > > I like this idea. This will help reduce dogmatism. > > Does this proposal need a wiki page? (I'm not trying to be ironic, just > asking) > > Dan > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
