-1
'Endorsed' is just another way of saying approved. We need to remove
this status that 'some authority' has given their blessing to use the tag.
'Published' is a useful statement which demonstrates community
discussion and some consensus but nothing else.
--
Cheers, Chris
user: chillly
On 03/04/15 11:56, Jan van Bekkum wrote:
One more idea: why do we need a binary outcome of the voting?
Something like endorsement= positive/neutral/negative (the current
approve, abstain, reject) as an indicator tells much more (together
with tag use). Examples:
* Endorsement=50/0/2 - very good, important tag (much involvement) -
go on and use
* Endorsement=10/0/1 - good tag, of interest to a small group - go
on and use
* Endorsement=35/4/28 - not a very good tag, but about an important
topic - nothing better possible?
* Endorsement = 4/0/3 - not a very good tag, but few people care -
use as you see fit
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 12:05 PM Jan van Bekkum
<jan.vanbek...@gmail.com <mailto:jan.vanbek...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Will it be clear for new mappers what the difference is between
published and documented (i.e. someone created a wiki page that
describes a tag without voting or one that didn't collect enough
votes)? Wouldn't endorsed be better?
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
