What are those toilets? Are they little shacks like this one: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Pit_latrines_in_Briqueterie_-_des_latrines_%C3%A1_fosses_%C3%A0_la_Briqueterie,_Yaounde_%283447843124%29.jpg
If so, then maybe building=toilet could be the best fit. I've been looking at tags from the example, and they are contradictory. A lot of them have tags unisex=yes and female=no. 2015-03-03 10:31 GMT+01:00 Bryce Nesbitt <bry...@obviously.com>: > On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 1:26 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer < > dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> 2015-03-02 21:01 GMT+01:00 Mateusz Konieczny <matkoni...@gmail.com>: >> >>> "access=no or access=private do not seem to make much sense" >>> Toilet may be open only to to a limited public - in military base, only >>> for employees or out of order. >> >> >> >> IMHO this doesn't qualify as "open to public" and the tag amenity=toilets >> should not be applied there. >> E.g. the toilets in my home are also open to a limited subset of the >> public, me, my family, our visitors, occassionally even friends of friends >> of friends if they ask nicely. >> > > Your home toilet is very clearly private (I expect :-). > > The military base is a bit different, though maybe not enough different. > On a tour a member of the public may be able to enter. The same can be > said for public buildings like the White House, or the halls of congress. > > > --- > But let's get back to the question we're sitting on. Can we retag known > home toilets, or should we be purging them? > Are we all agreed that in fully private amenities have little role in OSM? > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging