On 18.10.2012 17:34, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > I think we have to differentiate here. Some of these services have > pages *about* an object (like foursquare, TripAdvisor, ...) and others > have pages maintained *by* the "object" (company etc.) itself, e.g. > facebook, myspace, twitter, ... > > If we allow "website" as link out of OSM it'd like to allow links to > the second group above as well, as long as the content is freely > accessible (i.e. no registration or login required to view the > content). We might also think of allowing links to the first group, > but it should be restricted to open data databases/content (e.g. we > already link to wikipedia).
+1, this sounds like a good rule of thumb. So we would include - content about the object maintained by its operator, if publicly visible to any internet user without login, payment or other barriers. - open/free/libre third party content about the object. Unlike attempting to include any link somehow related to the object, this could actually keep the number of links to a manageable amount. Tobias _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
