2012/10/17 Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> > 2012/10/17 Martin Vonwald <imagic....@gmail.com>: > > Same image as before: > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Lanes_Example_2.png > > > > Now consider part 4 to 6. At what point would you split the way coming > > from part 4? > > a) Before the end of part 4 > > b) At the end of part 4/start of part 5 > > c) In the middle of part 5 > > d) At the end of part 5/start of part 6 > > e) Tell me! > > > d) > isn't this almost the same question? If you don't split the way for > part 5 you cannot do a) or b) and given how short part 5 is, there is > no real difference between c) and d) (but splitting "in the middle" > doesn't seem good advice at anytime). >
Just to be clear: I agree with Martin Koppenhoefer on splitting the ways only if there is a physical division. However, for the sake of geometry, I prefer to anticipate the split a bit, which is why I would put the split in section 5 or maybe even earlier - the actual position depends on how long section 5 is and how harsh the split is. Regards!
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
