Martin, I think you meant -1 rather than +1. Andy, place=locality is incompatible with neighbourhoods, as it is used with uninhabited places, at least according to the definition on the wiki.
It appears some of those examples are in conflict with the definition that seems to have been around for quite a while. Does anyone know how this tag is actually used? -Josh On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 12:44 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2011/4/14 SomeoneElse <li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk>: >> "neighbourhood" sounds pretty similar to "locality" - a couple of examples >> on the place=locality page could count (e.g. Seacroft in Leeds, if it's >> considered too small to be a suburb). >> >> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Locality >> >> Whoever wrote "does not have any population" at the top of that page >> probably didn't intend this use, however. > > > +1 > I strongly discourage to change the meaning of place=locality from > uninhabited place to part of a settlement. This would be almost the > contrary. > > cheers, > Martin > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
