2011/1/6 Nathan Edgars II <nerou...@gmail.com>: > On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 7:14 PM, Steve Bennett <stevag...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On any way without a highway=*, cycleway=track is meaningless/redundant. > > How about railway=* cycleway=track? > http://www.railstotrails.org/ourWork/trailBuilding/toolbox/informationSummaries/rails-with-trails.html
What about highway=cycleway, railway=track ? (OK, this is not really serious). Or waterway=river, railway=track, highway=track? This would maybe render better than separate ways ;-) I would not encourage implicit mapping. It isn't better, even if there might be cases where it renders better. Don't map for the renderer. If there is separate distinct ways in reality I would map them separately. Cheers, Martin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
