On 28/09/2010 02:41, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 9:35 PM, Dave F.<dave...@madasafish.com> wrote:
On 28/09/2010 01:41, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
Strawman. We're only talking about former railway alignments.
Hmm... not sure you understand the meaning of the straw man argument.
-----
You're (sic) statement "Because we don't only map what's currently there."
proves
you (& I) have moved the discussion on to include all data.
False dichotomy. There's a big difference between mapping only what's
current and mapping everything that has ever existed.
Err... Yes?! That's been a part of my point all along - a big increase
in data clutter!
Then what database would you move it to?
Either way it's historic information.
These are clearly statements form someone who doesn't have sound
reasoning & is just arguing for the sake of it.
Goodnight
Dave f.
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
