On 28/09/2010 01:11, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 8:00 PM, Dave F.<dave...@madasafish.com> wrote:
But only add what is actually visibly there now. Not what was there fifty
years ago.
What was there 50 years ago is useful,
I agree
and removing it would be
vandalism.
I disagree. How can it be vandalism if it's not there anymore?
You can argue about whether Mapnik should show it, but
don't remove it.
For those who want to keep historic records (& I think there should be),
they should take a record of current data at regular intervals & keep it
in a separate database.
If historic data was kept within OSM it would become far to cluttered.
Why do you think it should remain in the OSM database?
@Martin K.
To me data is data, irrelevant of how it was added. Only current data
should be within the OSM database.
Cheers
Dave F.
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
