2010/9/27 Lennard <l...@xs4all.nl>: > On 27-9-2010 16:25, Noel David Torres Taño wrote: >> >> What about abandoned=yes ? > > And expect every data consumer to have to parse that in addition to whatever > bridge=* value you leave on the data. What's not there anymore is just that: > not there anymore. It doesn't deserve a bridge=* tag.
exactly. As long as it is a bridge (abandoned or not), it is a bridge. Otherwise it might be ruins or sth. similar, but not a bridge. You could tag ruins=bridge for this. I also have an example for this, where abandoned would probably be not expressive enough: http://www.23hq.com/dieterdreist/photo/6058662 cheers, Martin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
