On Mon, 09 Aug 2010 08:40:13 -0400, Nathan Edgars II wrote: > On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 8:29 AM, Anthony > <o...@inbox.org> wrote: >> On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Paul Johnson >> <ba...@ursamundi.org> wrote: >>> The way I've been handling this is to stretch the limits of the >>> bicycle=destination tag; if it's more major than residential, open to >>> bicycles, but lacks shoulders and has narrow lanes or on-street >>> parking, then I tag it bicycle=destination (unless it qualifies for >>> cycleway=lane). >> >> Please don't do that. > > Agreed. *=destination means local traffic only; I've removed the tag.
Please stop doing that. While the cycle network is not fully mapped in the area, impeding it's progress by reverting routes that are local only because there is an immediately adjacent cycleway or bicycle boulevard under Oregon law ORS 814.420 is not helpful or necessary. As the Data Working Group pointed out, it's also extremely poor form to revert work done by people who actually know the area, especially when the person doing the reverting has never even set foot in said area (as evidenced by your lack of GPX tracks). Feel free to hire a lawyer who has passed the Oregon bar if you want to try to continue down this path; otherwise you're simply vandalizing the map and discouraging anyone local from editing. Stick to what you actually know. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
