On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 9:37 AM, Alan Mintz <alan_mintz+...@earthlink.net> wrote: > At 2009-12-22 11:59, Roy Wallace wrote: >>I think Karlsruhe is still the best approach - e.g. even if you have >>4, 6, 12, 18, 50, an even interpolation way from 4 to 50 is the best >>you can do short of mapping each address individually. > > Except for this pesky line in the wiki page, which is what implies the > presence of all housenumbers on an interpolation way: > > "For missing house numbers (e.g. missing "12") two ways need to be drawn > (e.g. "1-11" and "13-25")."
IMHO this should be prefixed with "Ideally, ...". If you know the two ends, go with addr:interpolation. Also, have you seen addr:inclusion? You may want to contribute to some ideas here: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr#Using_Address_Interpolation_for_partial_surveys _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
