Alan Mintz wrote: > At 2009-12-22 11:59, Roy Wallace wrote: >> I think Karlsruhe is still the best approach - e.g. even if you have >> 4, 6, 12, 18, 50, an even interpolation way from 4 to 50 is the best >> you can do short of mapping each address individually. > > Except for this pesky line in the wiki page, which is what implies the > presence of all housenumbers on an interpolation way: > > "For missing house numbers (e.g. missing "12") two ways need to be drawn > (e.g. "1-11" and "13-25")."
Well, that's the very reason for the recent invention of the addr:inclusion key. By adding this tag with an appropriate value, you are basically opting out of that accuracy requirement. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr#Using_Address_Interpolation_for_partial_surveys Tobias Knerr _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
