2009/12/6 James Livingston <doc...@mac.com>: > I'd hope that bicycle=no would have the same implications for having a > bicycle without riding it as other *=no tags would for their transports. For > example I would guess that where horse=no is used, you often can't walk your > horse as well as not riding it. So maybe having a separate tag for things > which are not allowed (e.g. prohibited=bicycle;horse;explosives) could be > the way to go.
erm, wouldn't horse=prohibited be closer to current usage, eg horse=no.... ? _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
