On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 5:31 PM, James Livingston <doc...@mac.com> wrote: >> >> erm, wouldn't horse=prohibited be closer to current usage, eg horse=no.... ? > > If horse=*, bicycle*, motorcar=* are for tagging the restrictions on using > them as a vehicle, then I'd say not. prohibited=* would also let you tag > other items that are not allowed, such as explosives, dogs, or whatever else. > > What I'm thinking about is that activities should be tagged as *=no, so not > being allowed to ride a bicycle -> bicycle=no, but certain items being > prohibited in an area could be prohibited=*
Ok, so horse=no currently refers to "using a horse as a vehicle"? Does it not also imply that the possession/leading of a horse is prohibited? Another problem with prohibited=* alongside *=no is that the horse/bicycle/motorcar sometimes appears in the *key*, and sometimes in the *value*. A bit inconsistent and confusing. But I don't have a solution... _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
