Greg, I like that it's very simple to read. Having a summary is good. And the other email which lists the exact ids extra/missing per testament is very helpful.
I think that enumerating the names of the extra/missing books and extra/missing chapters would be good. No sense in enumerating the ids within these. I ran mine against an input that was a test case for osis2mod’s infinite loop and it had 2 extra books and 13 extra chapters. This wouldn’t be obvious in your results. Is it an advantage or disadvantage to be compiled against SWORD lib vs slurping header files? — DM > On Jun 19, 2025, at 12:00 AM, Greg Hellings <greg.helli...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Here is an example of the first lines of running my script against the > kjv.osis.xml file from the git repo: > > > Checking Calvin: > ---------------- > There are 93 OT IDs and 5 NT IDs in v11n which aren’t in your file. > There are 0 OT IDs and 30 NT IDs in your file which don’t appear in > v11n. > > Checking Catholic: > ------------------ > There are 4530 OT IDs and 3 NT IDs in v11n which aren’t in your file. > There are 0 OT IDs and 133 NT IDs in your file which don’t appear in > v11n. > > Checking Catholic2: > ------------------- > There are 4638 OT IDs and 3 NT IDs in v11n which aren’t in your file. > There are 0 OT IDs and 133 NT IDs in your file which don’t appear in > v11n. > > Checking DarbyFr: > ----------------- > There are 31 OT IDs and 4 NT IDs in v11n which aren’t in your file. > There are 0 OT IDs and 30 NT IDs in your file which don’t appear in > v11n. > > This continues on to include such output as > > > > Checking KJV: > ------------- > Your file has all the references in this v11n > Your file has no extra references > > > > Checking KJVA: > -------------- > There are 5717 OT IDs and 0 NT IDs in v11n which aren’t in your file. > Your file has no extra references > > giving a clear example of a winner for this particular file. > > Meanwhile, running it against the kjva.osis.xml file includes this in the > results: > > ... > > Checking KJV: > ------------- > Your file has all the references in this v11n > There are 2 OT IDs and 5715 NT IDs in your file which don’t appear in > v11n. > > Checking KJVA: > > -------------- > > Your file has all the references in this v11n > Your file has no extra references > ... > > Fiddling with the file has showed me there are a couple of places where I > need to tweak it for Python 3 compatibility that I missed the last time I > updated. But fixing those couple of little syntax issues resulted in it > running just fine in a Fedora 41 vm with nothing more to do than invoke `dnf > install python3-sword` to setup the system to use it. > > --Greg > > On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 10:40 PM Greg Hellings <greg.helli...@gmail.com > <mailto:greg.helli...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> My script eschews percentages because they seemed relatively pointless to me >> for measuring a mismatch like this. Instead it gives a count of both Old and >> New Testament osisIDs that it finds missing and another that it finds >> unexpectedly for a given versification. If the total of either count is >> fewer than 100, the IDs for that particular count are printed to the >> console. It will do this for every registered versification in the version >> of the library it was compiled against, allowing the user to select >> whichever one seems best to them based on the results. >> >> On Wed, Jun 18, 2025, 10:25 PM David Haslam <dfh...@protonmail.com >> <mailto:dfh...@protonmail.com>> wrote: >>> It’s not just the number of “missing” verses that should figure in the >>> percentage score, but also the number of verses that get concatenated to >>> the last one in a chapter. >>> >>> The differences in v11n for the Psalms will be especially significant for >>> this, in that some v11n renumber many of them. Likewise for the last few >>> chapters in the book of Job. >>> >>> Aside: It would be cool to enhance the utility emptyvss by providing a >>> command line option that would ignore books that are not included in the >>> scope parameter in the conf file. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> David >>> >>> On Thu, Jun 19, 2025 at 03:18, DM Smith <dmsm...@crosswire.org >>> <mailto:On+Thu,+Jun+19,+2025+at+03:18,+DM+Smith+%3C%3Ca+href=>> wrote: >>>> >>>> David, >>>> >>>> Because it only considers the xml, scope is automatically built into it. >>>> It is only comparing what is present in the xml with what is part of the >>>> av11ns. >>>> >>>> It might be good to add the enumeration of missing verses. >>>> >>>> — DM >>>> >>>>> On Jun 18, 2025, at 4:02 PM, David Haslam <dfh...@protonmail.com >>>>> <mailto:dfh...@protonmail.com>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Does it take account of the Scope key in the .conf file for a less than >>>>> complete Bible ? >>>>> >>>>> David >>>>> >>>>> Sent from Proton Mail <https://proton.me/mail/home> for iOS >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 20:51, DM Smith < dmsm...@crosswire.org >>>>> <mailto:On+Wed,+Jun+18,+2025+at+20:51,+DM+Smith+%3C%3Ca+href=>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> Several have commented on how hard it is to test an OSIS xml file >>>>>> against v11ns especially since it goes off into an infinite loop. (I’ve >>>>>> posted a patch that fixes that) But it is still a process of trial and >>>>>> error to find an appropriate v11n. >>>>>> >>>>>> So, I’ve been iterating with chatGPT to create a python script to find a >>>>>> best fit v11n. Since I don’t know python, I can’t vouch for the script >>>>>> beyond it worked for a simple test case that had an extra chapter for >>>>>> Genesis and had some extra verses at the end of a chapter in that book. >>>>>> >>>>>> I offer it, as a starting place. See the attached file. >>>>>> >>>>>> It has a —debug flag. >>>>>> The first argument is expected to be the OSIS xml file. >>>>>> The second argument is optional and gives the location to the include >>>>>> directory of svn/sword/trunk/include with all the canon*.h files. If you >>>>>> don’t supply the argument, it uses the web to load the canon*.h files >>>>>> from https://www.crosswire.org/svn/sword/trunk/include. >>>>>> >>>>>> It will score the fitness of each of the v11ns. It gives the score as a >>>>>> %, but I don’t know what that means. I told it that it should prioritize >>>>>> book matches, then chapter matches and finally verse matches. I don’t >>>>>> know how well it did that scoring. I didn’t test for that. >>>>>> >>>>>> The output is alphabetized. If more than one v11n have the same high >>>>>> score, they are listed. >>>>>> >>>>>> In His Service, >>>>>> DM >>>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org >>>>> <mailto:sword-devel@crosswire.org> >>>>> http://crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel >>>>> Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org >>> <mailto:sword-devel@crosswire.org> >>> http://crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel >>> Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page > _______________________________________________ > sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org > http://crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel > Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
_______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
