Didn’t know about that. Sounds like a great idea. I think the modules team should include such in their module building protocol.
As I said, I don’t know python and have never programmed in it. But I can read and tweak them. > On Jun 18, 2025, at 4:03 PM, Greg Hellings <greg.helli...@gmail.com> wrote: > > There has been this file, which I think I wrote a geological epoch ago: > https://www.crosswire.org/svn/sword-tools/trunk/versification/av11n.py > > Like yours, it is a very rough attempt to brute force compare the osisIDs > found in a file with known versification schemes. > > Unlike yours, it depends on having the Sword Python bindings installed rather > than directly parsing the versification data found in the canon.h files. > > It is also older than old, so I can't vouch for whether it still works. But > from what I can see, it was last worked on in the Python 3 era. So there is a > chance that it might work. It might be worth pulling ideas from your script > into the one I've written and finding the best overall solutions based on the > comparisons and the mechanism for it to work. > > --Greg > > On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 2:50 PM DM Smith <dmsm...@crosswire.org > <mailto:dmsm...@crosswire.org>> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Several have commented on how hard it is to test an OSIS xml file against >> v11ns especially since it goes off into an infinite loop. (I’ve posted a >> patch that fixes that) But it is still a process of trial and error to find >> an appropriate v11n. >> >> So, I’ve been iterating with chatGPT to create a python script to find a >> best fit v11n. Since I don’t know python, I can’t vouch for the script >> beyond it worked for a simple test case that had an extra chapter for >> Genesis and had some extra verses at the end of a chapter in that book. >> >> I offer it, as a starting place. See the attached file. >> >> It has a —debug flag. >> The first argument is expected to be the OSIS xml file. >> The second argument is optional and gives the location to the include >> directory of svn/sword/trunk/include with all the canon*.h files. If you >> don’t supply the argument, it uses the web to load the canon*.h files from >> https://www.crosswire.org/svn/sword/trunk/include. >> >> It will score the fitness of each of the v11ns. It gives the score as a %, >> but I don’t know what that means. I told it that it should prioritize book >> matches, then chapter matches and finally verse matches. I don’t know how >> well it did that scoring. I didn’t test for that. >> >> The output is alphabetized. If more than one v11n have the same high score, >> they are listed. >> >> In His Service, >> DM >> >> _______________________________________________ >> sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org >> <mailto:sword-devel@crosswire.org> >> http://crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel >> Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page > _______________________________________________ > sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org > http://crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel > Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
_______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
