Yes I found that to be true (CCELs versification was, by the authors own admission, error ridden). Regardless, with a bit of work was able to create one that wasn't, which the CCEL one helped validate.
~A On Thursday, August 9, 2012, Chris Little wrote: > On 08/08/2012 07:05 PM, Andrew Thule wrote: > >> Thanks Greg .. I've done that, and compared what comes with Sword to >> what's listed here: >> https://crosswire.org/svn/**sword-tools/trunk/**versification/basicv11ns/<https://crosswire.org/svn/sword-tools/trunk/versification/basicv11ns/> >> >> The only difference, as far as I was able to tell was canon_gnt.h does >> not appear to ship with sword. I assume it was pruned or included >> with others. Otherwise the contents appear the same. >> >> I've found a verification here: >> http://www.ccel.org/refsys/**Bible.LXX.xml<http://www.ccel.org/refsys/Bible.LXX.xml> >> >> I'm going to try to create a canon_lxx.h myself - but what use is >> that? If I successfully translate the CCEL LXX versification into a >> canon_lxx.h file and submit it - does that actually help anything? >> > > I'll put a little time into a new versification system right now, but in > general I would not accept any submissions of versification systems. CCEL's > versification data, especially, is so error-ridden as to be worthless. > > --Chris > > > ______________________________**_________________ > sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org > http://www.crosswire.org/**mailman/listinfo/sword-devel<http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel> > Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page >
_______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
