Fons Adriaensen wrote:
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 09:23:47PM +0000, Stefan Schreiber wrote:
If you use amplitude panning between more than 2 (2D) or 3 (3D/VBAP)
speakers, you could run into some trouble. Including X-talk between
more than 2 speakers in the horizont. plain... (same phantom source)
This might lead to quite messy ITD and ILD problems.
So I believe it could make a lot of sense to apply amplitude panning
to the exact minimum amount of speakers you would need to produce
some phantom image effect. Which means 2 speakers in the 2D case, 3
in the 3D case.
This was actually proven wrong long ago, and it is what Ambisonic
decoding gets right.
Nice, because I didn't reproduce anthing and just made up my own little
theory about "minimum neighbour number amplitude panning". (MNNAP.)
Stefan
P.S.:
It's really similar to what happens if you interpolate between
samples using only the two nearest ones.
Two <nearest neighbour samples>, see above! ;-)
Not 1, not 5...
_______________________________________________
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit
account or options, view archives and so on.
