Fons Adriaensen wrote:

On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 09:23:47PM +0000, Stefan Schreiber wrote:

If you use amplitude panning between more than 2 (2D) or 3 (3D/VBAP)
speakers, you could run into some trouble. Including X-talk between
more than 2 speakers in the horizont. plain... (same phantom source)

This might lead to quite messy ITD and ILD problems.

So I believe it could make a lot of sense to apply amplitude panning
to the exact minimum amount of speakers you would need to produce
some phantom image effect. Which means 2 speakers in the 2D case, 3
in the 3D case.

This was actually proven wrong long ago, and it is what Ambisonic
decoding gets right.
Nice, because I didn't reproduce anthing and just made up my own little theory about "minimum neighbour number amplitude panning". (MNNAP.)

Stefan

P.S.:

It's really similar to what happens if you interpolate between
samples using only the two nearest ones.

Two <nearest neighbour samples>, see above!   ;-)
Not 1, not 5...

_______________________________________________
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit 
account or options, view archives and so on.

Reply via email to