On Sat, Dec 08, 2012 at 08:39:58PM +0000, Augustine Leudar wrote: > someone was telling me 3d wfs is theoretically possible but would be > computationally very very expensive. The only issue I would have with > combining WFS synthesis and say ambisonics or vbap for height is that I > dont have time or knowledge to write such a program (unless somebody > invented a wavefield synthesis external for max msp - then I could) - for > sound design its nice to have a dot (sound source) you can move around - > this would have to scroll between the two panning techniques (wfs for > azimuth and ambisoncs/vbap for height) - this is what Matts basically done > - the results of his listening tests are not bad either - though he admits > the weakness is the height info....
Another question is why you would use WFS for the horizontal part at all. Does it offer anything you need and that HOA can't do ? Ciao, -- FA A world of exhaustive, reliable metadata would be an utopia. It's also a pipe-dream, founded on self-delusion, nerd hubris and hysterically inflated market opportunities. (Cory Doctorow) _______________________________________________ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
