(I do not intend to reply to every message; I would rather hear opinions, and occasionally summarize points for discuss or check consensus on individual points; but answering questions is different)
On 3/15/16, 6:26 PM, "Ted Lemon" <[email protected]> wrote: >When was the last document published that updated one of the IPv4 >specifications? > >Are we counting routing drafts? https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc791 says that rfc791 has been updated three times: RFC 1349 <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1349>, Type of Service in the Internet Protocol Suite, 1992. RFC 2474 <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2474>, Definition of the Differentiated Services Field (DS Field) in the IPv4 and IPv6 Headers, 1998. RFC 6864 <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6864>, Updated Specification of the IPv4 ID Field, 2013. I would argue that if a case like any of those happened today, it would be fine to update IPv6 and leave IPv4 as it is. Lee _______________________________________________ sunset4 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sunset4
