Lee, It's the right thing to do to set a stake in the ground and stop developing new standards that rely on IPv4. Why not now? +1
I think your draft is more appropriate at this time than the one we were working on to shutdown IPv4 on a specific date (https://github.com/jacqueslatour/Shutdown-IPv4) Jacques From: sunset4 [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Alejandro Acosta Sent: March-15-16 1:16 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [sunset4] Declaring IPv4 Historic Hi Lee, I read both, your blog post and your draft. I believe this is a quite interesting idea, actually I support it but my suggestion is to make (the whole draft) it more "IPv4 core" centric. I mean, for example: "The IETF does not update Historic RFCs. Therefore, the IETF will no longer work on IPv4 technologies, including transition technologies. " I would remove transition technologies, also, as suggested by Marc, more context around this text would be a good idea. Regards, Alejandro, El 3/15/2016 a las 2:39 AM, Lee Howard escribió: As noted below, I've posted a draft. I thought I'd start a thread for discussing it. PLEASE Please please read the draft before commenting. It's very short, less than 500 words, and I anticipate a lot of people having strong feelings about it. I would really rather not waste time arguing about things it doesn't say. To that end, I've also written a blog post, explaining in a level of detail I thought inappropriate for the draft: http://www.wleecoyote.com/blog/ipv4-historic.htm Thank you, Lee From: sunset4 <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of Wesley George <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Monday, March 14, 2016 at 6:28 PM To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: [sunset4] Agenda items? As you can see, we have a meeting scheduled for BA. As of right now, we have a single agenda item: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-howard-sunset4-v4historic-00 While I fully expect that this item can expand to fill all available time, if there are other things that the WG wishes to discuss, please respond ASAP to request agenda time. Thanks, Wes Anything below this line has been added by my company's mail server, I have no control over it. ----------- ________________________________ This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail and any printout. _______________________________________________ sunset4 mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sunset4 _______________________________________________ sunset4 mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sunset4
_______________________________________________ sunset4 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sunset4
