On 15 Mar 2016, at 3:09, Lee Howard wrote:
As noted below, I¹ve posted a draft. I thought I¹d start a thread
for
discussing it.
starting the discussion ;-)
- courageous you are.
« The IETF does not update Historic RFCs. Therefore, the IETF will
no
longer work on IPv4 technologies, including transition
technologies. »
I think this needs clarification. For example:
- what does that mean for current protocols specifications that are
already dual-stacked, when they are updated? If there is a field with
IPv4 address in the update specification, what does that really mean?
It might just break the protocol if we avoid the IPv4 address in the
update. SIP/WebRTC comes to mind…
- transition technologies. you meant I guess IPv4 to IPv6 transition
technologies. Might be good to be more explicit.
- transition technologies: there are a few that are « helping » IPv6
deployment, one in mind is NAT64/DNS64. Does this mean we can not work
on augmenting/making NAT64/DNS64 better?
Marc.
PLEASE Please please read the draft before commenting. It¹s very
short, less
than 500 words, and I anticipate a lot of people having strong
feelings
about it. I would really rather not waste time arguing about things it
doesn¹t say.
To that end, I¹ve also written a blog post, explaining in a level of
detail
I thought inappropriate for the draft:
http://www.wleecoyote.com/blog/ipv4-historic.htm
Thank you,
Lee
From: sunset4 <[email protected]> on behalf of Wesley George
<[email protected]>
Date: Monday, March 14, 2016 at 6:28 PM
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: [sunset4] Agenda items?
As you can see, we have a meeting scheduled for BA.
As of right now, we have a single agenda item:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-howard-sunset4-v4historic-00
While I fully expect that this item can expand to fill all available
time, if
there are other things that the WG wishes to discuss, please respond
ASAP to
request agenda time.
Thanks,
Wes
Anything below this line has been added by my company¹s mail server,
I have no
control over it.
-----------
This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable
proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or
subject to
copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended
solely for
the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you
are not
the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that
any
dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to
the
contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and
may be
unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify
the sender
immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this
E-mail
and any printout.
_______________________________________________ sunset4 mailing list
[email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sunset4
_______________________________________________
sunset4 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sunset4
_______________________________________________
sunset4 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sunset4
