Hi Lee,
  I read both, your blog post and your draft.
  I believe this is a quite interesting idea, actually I support it but
my suggestion is to make (the whole draft) it more "IPv4 core" centric.
  I mean, for example:

"The IETF does not update Historic RFCs.  Therefore, the IETF will no
   longer work on IPv4 technologies, including transition technologies.
"

  I would remove transition technologies, also, as suggested by Marc,
more context around this text would be a good idea.
 
Regards,

Alejandro,


El 3/15/2016 a las 2:39 AM, Lee Howard escribió:
> As noted below, I’ve posted a draft. I thought I’d start a thread for
> discussing it.
>
> PLEASE Please please read the draft before commenting. It’s very
> short, less than 500 words, and I anticipate a lot of people having
> strong feelings about it. I would really rather not waste time arguing
> about things it doesn’t say.
>
> To that end, I’ve also written a blog post, explaining in a level of
> detail I thought inappropriate for the
> draft: http://www.wleecoyote.com/blog/ipv4-historic.htm
>
> Thank you,
>
> Lee
>
> From: sunset4 <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of Wesley George
> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> Date: Monday, March 14, 2016 at 6:28 PM
> To: "[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>>
> Subject: [sunset4] Agenda items?
>
>     As you can see, we have a meeting scheduled for BA. 
>     As of right now, we have a single agenda item:
>
>     https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-howard-sunset4-v4historic-00
>
>     While I fully expect that this item can expand to fill all
>     available time, if there are other things that the WG wishes to
>     discuss, please respond ASAP to request agenda time. 
>
>     Thanks,
>
>      
>
>     Wes
>
>      
>
>     Anything below this line has been added by my company’s mail
>     server, I have no control over it.
>
>     -----------
>
>
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>     This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner
>     Cable proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential,
>     or subject to copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This
>     E-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity
>     to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of
>     this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
>     distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the contents
>     of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may
>     be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please
>     notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original
>     and any copy of this E-mail and any printout.
>     _______________________________________________ sunset4 mailing
>     list [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sunset4 
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sunset4 mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sunset4

_______________________________________________
sunset4 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sunset4

Reply via email to