22 aug 2013 kl. 10:37 skrev Alex Balashov <abalas...@evaristesys.com>:
> On 08/22/2013 04:34 AM, Olle E. Johansson wrote: >> >> 22 aug 2013 kl. 10:27 skrev Alex Balashov <abalas...@evaristesys.com>: >> >>> On 08/22/2013 04:25 AM, Olle E. Johansson wrote: >>> >>>> Guessing that a URI with a user name should be forwarded to that >>>> address. URIs pointing to the domain of the server should be >>>> responded by the server. >>> >>> Yes, but shouldn't sip:user@proxy_ip and sip:proxy_ip both be serviced by >>> the server? >> >> If it's to an IP address I would answer 404 Not Found to both, SIP is domain >> based :-) >> >> user@ip is propably a 404, but yes, if a UA use this for keepalive we should >> propably >> answer - but in that case you don't really need a full options answer, just >> any >> 200 Ok will do. Or? > > Sure, which is why the stateless 200 OK solution works. > > But it seems to me that options_reply() ought to answer with a 404 Not Found; > it's what other UASs (like Asterisk) do... The Asterisk answer depends on your dialplan :-) /O _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
