On 08/22/2013 04:34 AM, Olle E. Johansson wrote:
22 aug 2013 kl. 10:27 skrev Alex Balashov <abalas...@evaristesys.com>:
On 08/22/2013 04:25 AM, Olle E. Johansson wrote:
Guessing that a URI with a user name should be forwarded to that
address. URIs pointing to the domain of the server should be
responded by the server.
Yes, but shouldn't sip:user@proxy_ip and sip:proxy_ip both be serviced by the
server?
If it's to an IP address I would answer 404 Not Found to both, SIP is domain
based :-)
user@ip is propably a 404, but yes, if a UA use this for keepalive we should
propably
answer - but in that case you don't really need a full options answer, just any
200 Ok will do. Or?
Sure, which is why the stateless 200 OK solution works.
But it seems to me that options_reply() ought to answer with a 404 Not
Found; it's what other UASs (like Asterisk) do...
--
Alex Balashov - Principal
Evariste Systems LLC
235 E Ponce de Leon Ave
Suite 106
Decatur, GA 30030
United States
Tel: +1-678-954-0670
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.alexbalashov.com/
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
