Hello,
The options_reply() function does not answer OPTIONS pings that contain
a username in the request URI. To its credit, the documentation does
say that, too:
http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/4.0.x/modules/siputils.html#idp131056
The question is: why not? I do not see anything in RFC 3261 Section
11.1 ("Construction of an OPTIONS Request") that seems to rule out an
OPTIONS request with a user part:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3261#section-11.1
Quite a few UAs out there, including, notably, Metaswitch, do send user
parts in the OPTIONS RURI. To deal with them, I am forced to simply
sl_send_reply("200", "OK");
instead of using options_reply().
What is the underlying theory?
Thanks,
-- Alex
--
Alex Balashov - Principal
Evariste Systems LLC
235 E Ponce de Leon Ave
Suite 106
Decatur, GA 30030
United States
Tel: +1-678-954-0670
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.alexbalashov.com/
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
