22 aug 2013 kl. 10:07 skrev Alex Balashov <abalas...@evaristesys.com>:
> Hello, > > The options_reply() function does not answer OPTIONS pings that contain a > username in the request URI. To its credit, the documentation does say that, > too: > > http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/4.0.x/modules/siputils.html#idp131056 > > The question is: why not? I do not see anything in RFC 3261 Section 11.1 > ("Construction of an OPTIONS Request") that seems to rule out an OPTIONS > request with a user part: > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3261#section-11.1 > > Quite a few UAs out there, including, notably, Metaswitch, do send user parts > in the OPTIONS RURI. To deal with them, I am forced to simply > > sl_send_reply("200", "OK"); > > instead of using options_reply(). > > What is the underlying theory? Guessing that a URI with a user name should be forwarded to that address. URIs pointing to the domain of the server should be responded by the server. /O _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
