I guess what I'm really asking is what is the difference in response time for linear heat detection versus my sprinkler heads? In this case, it's protecting cold storage, so it's a standard-response, high-temperature sprinkler.
-Kyle M From: Kyle.Montgomery Sent: Monday, September 23, 2024 4:45 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Double Interlock Pre-Action Systems It's my understanding that the premise behind double interlock pre-action systems is that they should be designed in such a way that, in the event of a fire, the detection (heat detector, flame detector, smoke detector, linear heat detection, etc.) should activate before a sprinkler head activates. Is there any formula or rule of thumb about how long the detection should take to activate versus how long the sprinkler should take to activate? I'm working on a project and the alarm guy is telling me that there is a built-in activation delay in the releasing panel between when the linear heat detection sends a signal and when the releasing panel activates the solenoid valve. Is that normal? I'm wondering if that delay will actually delay the activation time of my pre-action valve, or if the delay is short enough that it is less than the normal time delta between linear heat detection activation and sprinkler head activation. For example, if the built-in delay in the releasing panel is 15 seconds, but the delta between LHD activation and sprinkler head activation is normally more than 15 second, then there wouldn't be any tangible delay in the activation (opening) of the pre-action valve. Kyle Montgomery [cid:[email protected]] Aero Automatic Sprinkler Co. 21605 N. Central Ave. Phoenix, AZ 85024 Direct: 623.580.7820 Cell: 602.763.4736 [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
_________________________________________________________ SprinklerForum mailing list: https://lists.firesprinkler.org/list/sprinklerforum.lists.firesprinkler.org To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
